Understanding the “Drone Slayer” Lawsuit and it’s Implications

///Understanding the “Drone Slayer” Lawsuit and it’s Implications

Understanding the “Drone Slayer” Lawsuit and it’s Implications

William Meridith aka the Drone Slayer, Credit: YouTubeThe “Drone Slayer” federal lawsuit was recently dismissed by Senior U.S. District Judge Thomas Russell. I originally covered this story back in March of 2016 and more recently again when the dismissal occurred. In case you aren’t familiar with the story, here is the short version:

William Merideth shot down a drone flying over his home in June 2015. The drone’s pilot, David Boggs, filed a lawsuit in January asking the court in Louisville to make a legal determination as to whether his drone’s flight constituted trespassing. Boggs asked the court to rule that he is entitled to damages of $1,500 for his destroyed drone.

Attorney for “Drone Slayer” says federal lawsuit should be dismissed

You might be asking why exactly did William shoot down the drone? Why not just be neighborly and simply request that the drone not be flown over your your property? According to William:

He told police he had no way of knowing if the drone was being operated by “a predator looking at my children”.

Judge Dismisses Case Against ‘Drone Slayer’

What exactly was David Boggs suing for in this federal case? Boggs was seek $1,500 in damages. However the larger issue, for drone operators everywhere, is where is the property ownership line drawn when it comes to drones and trespassing. We can find the answer in a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case.

The issue of drones falls in line with the The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1946 case, United States v. Causby, which held that a chicken farmer could be compensated for the loss to his business caused by military planes that barely missed the tops of trees on his property.  The Supreme Court didn’t say how far the farmer’s property rights extended into the sky, but it found he owns “at least as much of the space above the ground as he can occupy or use in connection with the land.”

Trespassing Drone Fair Game? 

Taking that case into consideration, combined with witness testimony in the “Drone Slayer” case stating the drone was flying below the tree line, it becomes easier to understand why Judge Russell dismissed the case.

Next time you fly your drone, even if you are maintaining proper line of sight, always consider whose property you are flying over and possible even flying into.

By | 2017-08-31T15:23:36+00:00 April 6th, 2017|Drone Law, Drones|Comments Off on Understanding the “Drone Slayer” Lawsuit and it’s Implications

About the Author:

Sam Estrin
I'm an avid drone enthusiast and part-time drone blogger living in Southern California. I write drone news stories as well as collect drone news stories that I find interesting and add my own thoughts and opinions. If you like my stories, you can follow me on Twitter or visit me at LinkedIn. If you'd like me to write for your drone oriented publication or blog, you can contact me at info@droneuniversities.com.